Yeast K+ Channel
Our patch-clamp survey of the plasma membrane of budding yeast, S. cerevisiae, revealed the activities of one K+ channel (1) (Fig. 1) and one mechanosensitive channel (2).
Upon the completion of the yeast genome sequencing, four groups independently recognized a K+- channel gene, TOK1 (YKC1), predicting a subunit with a S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 P1 S6 S7 P2 S8 transmembrane topology (3,4).
An unusual property of this two pore-domain K+ channel is that it rectifies outwardly, not according to voltage, but to the total electrochemical potential of K+ (3,4). One study viewed TOK1 as an animal inward rectifier inserted backward, but the reported blockage by external Mg2+ (3) cannot be replicated. A detailed kinetic analysis showed that this rectification is due to an intrinsic gating property of the channel filter, which likely collapses when the K+ driving force is inward and resurrects when outward (5) (Fig. 2).
Besides the extremely rapid filter restructuring (akin to C-inactivation), TOK1 also exhibits a set of closed states of conventional kinetics. Mutations that hamper growth when expressed remove these closed states. These “gain-of-function” mutations, selected after random mutageneses, were found to be near the cytoplasmic end of S6 ad S8 (6) (Fig. 3). These “post-pore” regions, identified by these mutations that block gate closure coincide with the gating peptide and the gating hinge later resolved in the crystal structures of prokaryotic K+ channels (kcsA, MthK) by MacKinnon and coworkers.
TOK1 has an additional feature: the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the subunit function to maintain the gate’s open state (7) (Fig. 2). Surprisingly, this “foot-in-the-door” can be executed in trans, i.e. when the C-terminal domain is expressed as a separate peptide (8).
1. Gustin et al. (1986) Science 233: 1195.
2. Gustin et al. (1988) Science242: 762.
3. Ketchum et al. (1995) Nature376: 690.
4. Zhou et al. (1995) FEBS lett. 373:170.
5. Loukin & Saimi (1999) Biophy. J.77: 3060.
6. Loukin et al. (1997) EMBO J.16: 4817.
7. Loukin & Saimi (2002) Biophys. J. 82: 781.
8. Loukin et al. (2002) PNAS.99: 1926.
.